Find a Lawyer

SHAHIDUL QAYYUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) The loss of mismanaged store items was reduced to the lowest rank for a period of three years and the penalty for widespread fines, withholding the next annual increase for three years, and recovery of loss of store items. ? Imposed order by the Department Authority Service Tribunal on government employees, however, amended the pending order, so as to reduce the penalty for stopping the two-year increase by imposing a two-year period. The store purchased by the applicant was believed to have been lost), and for this reason, the only applicant's fault was that he did not receive the written approval of the officer who had purchased the air conditioner as directed and was not proved. It was held that the applicant was directly responsible for the shortage of store items and thus there was no valid basis for awarding any penalty to the former applicant. Further discussion of the applicant was that the applicant, due to the finding of the service tribunal. Was not allowed to examine the witnesses, so the inquiry concluded that this fraud Could not form the basis of any prejudicial proceedings against the petitioner which allowed the appeal to be considered. Consider raising the debate by the service tribunal against the petitioner against the reduction of his sentence filed by the government. The appeal was also granted in the adjoining appeal tax advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer