Find a Lawyer

KHALID NADEEM versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

Border Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1989 R10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appointment and Retirement of Respondent in place of Government Employee Suit for Retirement of a Government Employee on Medical Ground The public servant and his nephew, in his service, regularly challenged the claim that his nephew should have been appointed instead of the defendant, due to the trial. The trial court also appealed and revised the trial court's precision rule 10 (4), Northwestern Frontier Province, civil service (appointment, promotion and exchange) rule Eden, rejected the decision of 1989, which clearly shows that it was for the benefit of children of employees who died during service. The son of a retired civil servant, and the latter (his uncle) died during his retirement, thus, there was no legal claim for appointment to the post which was vacated upon his retirement. His uncle (a government employee) was not legally required to be appointed to post the question but to object to the appointment of the respondent in response to the question, his appointment did not violate the relevant rules. Was a regular officer in his service. The authority, even otherwise, had never applied for the position and, according to his claim that the law was irrevocable in the relationship, he had the right to challenge the appointment of a responsible person. There was no place, the leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khair Pur Mir lawyer