The prosecution failed to identify the circumstances in which section 13D evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, in which the alleged voluntary disclosure was made by the accused for the recovery of firearms and cartridges, thereby weakening the discovery. There was no independent and trusted advisor to the discovery denied by the accused. The time between the suspect's arrest and the date of the discovery was not determined, nor did the prosecution sheet explain the delay in the case. Which had arms and arms recovered. At the time of rehabilitation, the court was not present in the prosecution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
