OMARY JUMA SALI versus STATE
The trial court convicted him under section 156 (1) (8) of the Customs Act, 1969, for his conviction on charges of drug trafficking, and for two years. The punishment was severe. In his appeal from the jail, he was charged a fine of Rs 15,000 for his conviction that foreign trafficking was a crime against drug trafficking humanity which is in fact a problem for society today. Was not made. He was being punished severely by the courts for convicting the offender; drug trafficking increased rather than reduced; 950 grams of heroin was obtained from his body through prosecution on the arrest of the accused, crime against the accused. Was proven, he was sentenced to 14 years. The trial court had already shown a softening sentence in the sentence, no notice was issued to the accused on the increase of sentence, which could not be extended unilaterally. Sharp [punishment]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Farooqabad lawyer