Find a Lawyer

ABID MAHMOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 240, 199, 212 and 185 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 8 of Pakistan Engineering Council Act (V of 1976), Presented to the Petitioner \ Under Article 199 of the constitution, the constitutional petition was dismissed as prohibited under Article 212 of the Constitution when it was before the High Court that engineering graduates were presented to the applicants and diploma holders as respondents, Under this, the parties to litigation were effectively governed by Pakistan engineering. In the matter of appointment and development, the Council Act, 1976, and the Act did not permit persons who were not fully qualified engineers, but were diploma holders who held certain positions related to professional engineering works. The constitutional petition was dismissed under section 212, dismissing it. The legal status of the Constitution determines the e-federation in terms of service of persons in the service of Pakistan, under the Act of Parliament or under Article 240 of the Constitution of Pakistan Engineering Council Act 1976 as well as the Civil Servants Act 1976 Will go In order to qualify for the specified position, the applicant must go to the Service Tribunal, which was banned under the terms of Section 4, the Service Tribunals Act 1973 was fitness or appropriate and did not qualify that the applicant had filed the fitness Or did not challenge the suitability but the ability of the respondent to hold certain positions which was higher had to be crossed before deciding on fitness or suitability if the rules of service for the developed parties apply. So check the wires us immigration advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer