MUHAMMAD HASHIM RAZA versus STATE
Sections 526 and 340 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 10 (1) of the Lahore High Court Rules, Vo1 III, Chap. 24, R2 Amendments Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Right to be exchanged for trial Although the lawyer took judicial notice by the trial court that the accused was not represented by a lawyer, he did not advise the lawyer on public expenditure and began the trial and filed five prosecution witnesses. Write statements that were not cross-examined. Since the accused was not represented by a lawyer, however, the accused engaged a lawyer of his choice who filed a petition before the trial court for reconsideration of witnesses who had already been examined by the prosecution. And requested appropriate time for record inspection. Assist the court which was rejected which led to the establishment of a transfer request, a fair trial must include the right of an accused to defend a defendant. If he could afford a basic principle, then his choice was that justice should not only be done but it would appear that it would happen and where any situation would lead to doubt or mistrust. As a result, the management's trust is lost. Justice, which was essential to social order and security, was better that it should be done by a court whose neutrality could not be doubted and the trial of the accused pending trial in the trial court. The authorized jurisdiction was transferred to another court. For the de novo trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mandra lawyer