Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHAB versus AURANGZEB

In 1949, the plaintiff (donor) filed a Mohammedan Law Gift gift in favor of his sister's sons in 1969, challenging such a gift, saying that he had given his life in danger and that he had never Did not even occupy the land. Plaintiff's claim to the question (gift case) was made by all the courts through the High Court, in which Validity Dennis claimed that the fact of the transfer of possession in the custody proceedings also led to such a debate by the donor. finished. The holding of this text was not conclusive evidence in any proceedings about the disputed fact, and once the gift was not challenged for the purpose of occupying the land under the same ground, such a motion was proved in the text. May be. The High Court found that the donor (plaintiff), who was still on the ground, could not identify any weakness in the affidavit. The finding of the three courts below, including the High Court, is that they were never given possession of the land they owned, and there was no basis for interference in the High Court decision as such gift was not complete. law websites from Tando Jam lawyer