Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointment Appointment Appointment not eligible for failure of candidate interview on Public Service Commission recommendation The candidate challenged the Public Service Commission's recommendation on this basis. It was said that the defendants (designated) were not the required qualifications, the question of eligibility was decided by the renowned experts in the field and they were able to post the respondent in question and put them on the list of selected candidates. While the candidates were not even highly qualified, the court was in their constitutional jurisdiction Could not decide your conflicting questions. The question is whether the respondent has the required qualifications or does not include technical complications and such factual dispute questions cannot be passed by the High Court in his constitutional jurisdiction. WHH experts who had previously unanimously found that the defendant (appointment) was adequately qualified to hold the position in question, the election candidate was found to be unable to hold the position in question. The source, which included eminent personalities of the relevant field, could not, therefore, be appointed. The candidate in office in question was not up to the aggrieved person to challenge the appointment of defendant due to failure to qualify for the said post but constitutional petitions were not retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
