SHAHZAD MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus MST. SHAHNAZ FARZANA
Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 17 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OX, R 13, Sections 10 and 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition of minor daughter Two rival applications for detention. A mother's request was allowed by one mother and the other by the father while the father's request for custody of the minor was dismissed. The father did not inspect himself in support of his claim; his father was detained. Did not challenge the central order. The minor, who was given to his wife but filed an application under AIX, R13, CPC, which was removed from the provisions of sections 10 and 11 besides the CPC, did not challenge the central order. And the family court adopted by the husband in the challenge did not apply to the course, instead the formal order was advised, and the constitutional petition against the order under question was invalid, without merit and was retained. Was rejected for not being able to
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kunjah lawyer