Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD

R 5 (2) (a) (ii) The respondent of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212, being a diploma holder in drafting and designing, was denied this promotion by the Solipunk or Mechanical Service Tribunal in the relevant field. I was not a diploma holder. , The authorities were instructed to look into the issue of respondents advertising, having been promoted to B16 before being a diploma holder in drafting and designing and also its seniority to all other engineers. Was set aside and no objection was raised on that basis. Technology Respondent who was recognized diploma holder although fulfilled certain criteria in drafting and designing and in the relevant rule which was sufficiently qualified to promote against the 20% quota such as service tribunal respondents Was found right in the case. Along with this, the qualifications of the other sub-engineers were different from the fitness which the Selection Board or the Departmental Promotion Committee would consider on a full-fledged basis. CE record and overall performance of the officer concerned property advocate from Machh lawyer