SARNAWAZ versus THE STATE
The grant of a High Court directive given in the previous application of the accused for completing the trial within two months was not complied with, as per the section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 380/392/458 guarantee for which The accused were not responsible. Has been in custody for more than ten months and no witness has yet been examined by the trial court before the lower court misused the process of questioning during the investigation offense under section 411. From the evidence gathered, the PPC was prepared or the accused were liable under section 458/380/392, the PPC had yet to determine whether the accused were in judicial custody and needed further investigation. No previous criminals were not guaranteed to be allowed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khurian wala lawyer
