Find a Lawyer

SAFIULLAH SIDDIQUI versus KARACHI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED

The appearance and non-submission of the CPC of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX did not direct the parties to appear in the transfer court in the case of the transfer of the OI, R 13 and Section 24A (2) suit court, although it did not The date is fixed when the trial court respondents were to go to trial and their lawyer did not appear in the transfer court at the specified date, the respondents were ordered to issue the notice as stated in their written statement. That notice was not issued in the registered office of the respondent without such court order the notice of the respondent goes to the office of the lawyer's office several times. The remand was made but no present, after which the respondents' plea for dismissing the ex parte order was dismissed, however the High Court dismissed the decision. Setting aside the preceding party decree, the trial court was instructed to prosecute the trial court from the stage of framing the case from which the case was transferred. d failed to instruct the parties to appear before the transfer court on due date; its services could not be counted in the office of the Law Officer as the notice was not presented directly to the registered office of the respondents. Because a good service for a law officer's office cannot be considered. Respondent's Registered Office, Registered Office of the Respondents, Notice of Transfer of Case was not guaranteed for failure to appear as a result of the previous proceedings and proceedings against them, dismissing the ex-parte order from the High Court order. And the trial court shall order the trial court to proceed in accordance with the legal order. registration advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer