Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus INAYAT BIBI

The Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j) and 15 (2) (ii) in the payment of the rent the default tenant of the landlord and the tenant refuse to be the landlord's tenant. Was actually tenant as imposed. The tenancy landlord agreement, which was not denied by the executing tenant, had fully proved that it was executed only between the landlord and the tenant, following the implementation of the tenancy agreement. , There was no other reliable and reliable evidence. The tenant that was later implemented when the party became the landlord's tenant. The fact that the tenant was in the service and thus the landlord could not be a tenant, had no legal and valid power and competence, especially when the landlord proved through documentary evidence that oral The tenant contracted with it to find out that the rent controller, the person who later acquired the landlord's tenant as a party in the case of dismissal, was wrong and not against it. Was. Based on the proper definition of evidence, the tenant who refused to be a landlord who failed to pay the landlord's rent to the landlord through the person / brother of the tenant in the tenant's office. The rent was submitted, but was not proved. The tenant of the landlord will not pay rent by the tenant who failed to pay the rent for the rent for a disputed period, Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 registration advocate from Gharo lawyer