MIR ZAMAN KHAN versus CHAND JAMIA MASJID COMMITTEE TRUST
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 16 (1) (2) assaulted the tenant's defense of the tenant only because he submitted a month's rent with only one day's delay in his affidavit. The landlord filed a response in response to the owner's request. Far from defending the tenant, he explained that he offered the controversial rent to Nazir court around 11am, who told him he was late because the cash was already sent to the bank for deposit. Was given and Nazir should come the next day. It also assured (the tenant) that it would not be delayed or harmed. He submitted the rent the next day on Nazir's assurance, thus acknowledging the delay as a part of it, rather than praising the explanation, with no rejection by the rent controller. The tenant's obligation to terminate the tenant's defense without proper use of the tenant, and the court's mind, was the responsibility of the tenant to allow the tenant any reasonable opportunity to present evidence in such circumstances. Stops because of The landlord should also make timely deposit and similar opportunities to explain the tenant's offer, but the rent controller did not appreciate the proper explanation offered by the tenant. Otherwise the real estate tenant who had been collecting rent for a long time was late. Submitting rent for one day for one month only, recovery cannot be called default. Equity and justice demanded that the rent controller default on the default.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
