SAHIB KHAN versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Procedure for Recovery of Defendant, Permit to File a Case The request was not granted, by the defendant, an order was filed against him, the defendant filed an application to keep the order separate and to maintain the execution of the order in question, Upon the decision of his plea, a conditional order of bail was granted but the defendant failed to present the required guarantee, The stay order was termed the constitutional petition of the plaintiff and at the same time his intra-court appeal failed. The stay was approved, the banking tribunal justifying its stay order as the plaintiff's biggest point in entering constitutional pets, which meant that its default impact on bank guarantees was eliminated. There was, therefore, no exception to these enforced orders of the High Court High Court orders, no weakness of any kind was encountered, the appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Nowshero Feroz lawyer