I.T.A. NO.928/LB OF 1995 versus I.T.A. NO.928/LB OF 1995
The limited remand tribunal of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66 (1) (c) case was obtained by the remand for confirmation of the credit purchase and the reassessing officer had applied for a one year limit fixed under section 66 (1). Did not evaluate the case inside. (C)] After the limitation period in response to a notice issued by the Assessing Officer, the Assessee took the position that the Assessing Officer was forbidden to review, the claim of the Assessment was rejected, the entire appellate First Appellate Authority Has canceled this evaluation due to its expiration date. Held, the Revenue acknowledges that the Tribunal's order review authority was legally informed, that the evaluation proceedings initiated after a one-year interval were certainly 1, which in the circumstances of the Ordinance 5 ((1) ()).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Mangowal lawyer