Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

I.T.A. NO.928/LB OF 1995 versus I.T.A. NO.928/LB OF 1995


The limited remand tribunal of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66 (1) (c) case was obtained by the remand for confirmation of the credit purchase and the reassessing officer had applied for a one year limit fixed under section 66 (1). Did not evaluate the case inside. (C)] After the limitation period in response to a notice issued by the Assessing Officer, the Assessee took the position that the Assessing Officer was forbidden to review, the claim of the Assessment was rejected, the entire appellate First Appellate Authority Has canceled this evaluation due to its expiration date. Held, the Revenue acknowledges that the Tribunal's order review authority was legally informed, that the evaluation proceedings initiated after a one-year interval were certainly 1, which in the circumstances of the Ordinance 5 ((1) ()).

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Mangowal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.