Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAYYAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149 bail, acknowledging the disappearance of two of the prosecution's witnesses, including the victim's son, and then refusing to return to the police station immediately. ? The filing of the FIR has changed the position of the meaningful complainant in his supplementary statement on the reasonable grounds of his FIR, thus, there was no existence of conviction that the accused was in possession of Section 497 (1). Was guilty of an offense under the Prohibited Clause. Because the CCP and its case were involved in further investigations, he was entitled to bail that could not be stopped simply because his case was just about to begin or if the accused was allowed to bail. According to THI, there were Mohammad Ismail and Mohammad Rafiq and another PLD 1989 SC 585 Relland.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Khoski lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.