FAYYAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149 bail, acknowledging the disappearance of two of the prosecution's witnesses, including the victim's son, and then refusing to return to the police station immediately. ? The filing of the FIR has changed the position of the meaningful complainant in his supplementary statement on the reasonable grounds of his FIR, thus, there was no existence of conviction that the accused was in possession of Section 497 (1). Was guilty of an offense under the Prohibited Clause. Because the CCP and its case were involved in further investigations, he was entitled to bail that could not be stopped simply because his case was just about to begin or if the accused was allowed to bail. According to THI, there were Mohammad Ismail and Mohammad Rafiq and another PLD 1989 SC 585 Relland.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Nowshero Feroz lawyer