MIAN YASIN WATTOO versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 154 and 196 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 124 A / 120 B / 161/166/172/173/174/465/4681469/471 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 6 & 199 Constitutional petition was not barred from registering second FIR under FIR termination law as the allegations made on their faces were different from the first FIR but the complainant disclosed the incident. The other FIR was filed qualitatively, giving further details. The commission of various recognizable offenses, which the police officer could not refuse to file for section 196, does not in any way prevent the CRPC from investigating the matter in fact as it relates to the case. Pertaining to the trial of the accused. The police, who had not yet arrived, must perform their specially assigned duties without any outside interference under the Criminal Code, Chip XIV of 1898, and will begin only after the court has completed its duties. The invoice was not sought to interfere with the interference in the investigation of the case, as the investigating officer was obliged to ascertain the truth on the basis of the evidence of the parties. The constitutional application was accordingly dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kallat lawyer