Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MEHMOOD versus HUKAM KHAN

Specific relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit for declaration of title and claim for possession of up to 1/3 part of the property in question claims to be the brother of the defendant He was found in association with the revenue authorities. Taking advantage of his prolonged absence from the country, his name was removed from the record, one of the two defendants admitted to the claim of the plaintiff, while the other refused to recognize his brother and the suit sued for property. Was entitled to be dismissed by the trial court, but the appellate court affirmed that the defendant had a heavy burden on the defendant to bring sufficient evidence to support his claim. The plaintiff was born after her mother's divorce, while admitting in her statement before the court that she was divorced That the defendant failed to present any such evidence at the appellate stage and even before the High Court evidence on record, he shows the plaintiff and the defense that the NTS created in the marriage of his father and mother. Had been divorced and his mother had never been divorced by his mother. In the absence of the plaintiff, settlement was done in the area and the admission of the plaintiff to the settlement record was ineffective. The verdict was based on the law of the trial court and the reasonable cause of the order, and was entitled to be retained. online advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer