MUHAMMAD ALI versus MEHR SALABAT KHAN, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ARIFWALA, DISTRICT PAKPATTAN SHARIF
The original decree of the CPC Act XIII, R 2 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition seeking the application for the preparation of the third minor evidence in court after the defendant closed his evidence. I had a great opportunity. The testimony of the two witnesses below their evidence in court was, in fact, already examined by the person other than the plaintiff, which shows that the agreement in this case, on the basis of which the case was based. Was filed, not already presented in evidence by the investigating witnesses. Therefore, this question was not placed before the witnesses to show that in fact they were executed in their presence, the defendants voluntarily closed their evidence without recording the documents without any charge. , Request to present an illegal question of documents that has not been brought to the record by minor witnesses, will try to fill the lacuna in the evidence of another witness investigation. The trial court requested another witness to be examined. Had exercised its jurisdiction properly in denying permission, under the courts below Rea was a good thing within the law and did not appear to be arbitrary, imprisoned or unfair that imperfect arts approved by the courts had no precedent and patent defect. The circumstances were upheld in the case of extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction of the lower courts demanding interference.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Miran Shah lawyer