Find a Lawyer

KHANI ZAMAN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY

The Appellant claiming to be homeless under section 2 (d) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rehabilitation Act, 1974, was remanded by the Rehabilitation Authority in the name of the property under question, however, for the acquisition of the allotment of eviction property. , Such allotment was canceled by Custodian on this basis. The appellant's father owned more than one land and had no separate family as he belonged to his family. The fact that the appellants were married and the children themselves did not constitute a separate family does not have any conclusive evidence to show that they are a separate family. The allotment of land in question was on film grounds in favor of appeals which were not recognized by law. best law firm from Shorkot lawyer