Find a Lawyer

GUT MUHAMMAD versus FAHMIDA

Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The decision based on the case of the wife was denied the alleged payment of marriage by the wife and did not prove the husband. Requested that he pay certain amount for the wife's parents to consider the marriage but the claim was not endorsed by the husband but the husband himself examined it to consider the issue of marriage. She did not present any evidence in support of her version Family Court; thus, it was rightly concluded that the husband did not support the wife's parents Ah was not proved by the evidence to consider, because his word was stated by the wife, therefore, the payment by the husband's wife was not proved even though the return on receiving the khulla / benefits. Was imposed. And the evidence received by her, nevertheless, the proof of payment of the marriage and other benefits must be presented by the husband to the court and if there is no evidence of payment for such consideration of the marriage. , The Family Court concluded that the wife is entitled to Khulla Husband without giving any money to the husband as a refund, the absence of any proof the Family Court did not find the husband entitled. Refund of return for cash advocate from Dijkot lawyer