Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus GHULAM QADIR

CPC Appeals X XI, R 19 & O III R 1 Appeal Maintenance for the CLC Code Order XML Explanation was excluded for default when due to the absence of the appellant himself and his lawyer Eligible appeals were dismissed for illegal proceedings In support of the appellant's appeal reinstatement, it was requested that the relevant date be as evidence, it was neither directed by his lawyer nor his It was instructed by him that his presence was necessary on the due date, the absence of the party in that date which was fixed for the reasons, in accordance with the terms of the O III, R1, CPC. This is justified in the circumstances of the case power of attorney advocate Noshki lawyer