WAQAS ENTERPRISES versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN., LAHORE
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Sections 6 and 9 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 27 Legislative Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 129 Refusal to cancel such order by the bank having canceled the previous decree by the Banking Tribunal Not only did postal receipts on the record but they were also disputed by the appellants, the appellants did not claim that the addresses to which the notices were sent by the registered post were not their addresses. It is believed that the notices may have reached the appellants. Under the testimony of section 27, the General Clause Act, 1897 and Article 129, 1984, the idea arising under both objections may be rejected, but the appellants have failed to reject the evidence, but the parties have failed the banking tribunal. Have agreed not to present any evidence before. Judgment is made on the basis of the affidavit created by the petitioner, nothing was left on record by the respondent's affidavit dismissing the appellant's affidavit, which is due by the registered post. Speculation about services can be ruled out when the notices were deemed to reach the appellant, they were obliged to provide sufficient evidence to rule out such speculation. The parties themselves have agreed not to present any evidence and to rely on the affidavits filed by them, after which they do not lie in the mouth of the appellant to raise any objection that they are not allowed to present the evidence. It is, however, on record to show that appellants were aware of the prosecution in this case, one of which is that appellant's acquittal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
