Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ANWAAR ANWAR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Purchase Act 1993 Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A.X., R14 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Pre-discrimination Trial Pre-Purchase Amount At the time of submission, the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed by the District Court in connection with the fixed price and cost of sale for the pre-order decision on payment of fixed amount by the appellate court effector plaintiff but before the High Court There was no timetable for collecting arrest money. The plaintiff's appeal was also dismissed but the decision was made at the time of filing the pre-payment amount, but the plaintiff applied to the trial court for premature deposit but his request was rejected It was returned with a copy of the order of the High Court so that the pre-arrest money was deposited. , Plaintiff's request to submit, the district court High Court had previously dismissed the money, however, the extension of the time to submit the pre-emption implication is the plaintiff's opinion that any appeal before the High Court was appropriate. Was not and the High Court was not able to extend the time to submit the vacancy in advance so the detention court was denied that the High Court is capable of extending the time within its ideological jurisdiction. The related point was not appealed before the High Court and no address of the High Court could not be found, hence the order of the High Court. Under, the district court did not face a lack of jurisdiction while the plaintiff's request was legally binding to deal criminal advocate from Guddu lawyer