MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus STATE
Article 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The version of the prosecution was completely dismissed by the prosecution witness and the prosecution case was completely abolished and Witnesses were allowed to enter the company. The deceased was not proven on the day of the incident, but contradicted the defense evidence. The only independent witness prosecution of the incident had the accused excused for the recovery of blood stains by the accused at the slightest excuse. There was no significant value because neither the accused, who remained in large numbers for 22/23 days after the incident, could be expected to allow blood to remain on the above subjects, nor would blood stains be maintained on them. Can stay 32 days after the incident, especially when they were buried underground, the participation of an accused who was only 12/13 years old and had no motive was highly suspected against the victim. The benefit was eliminated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Pannu aqil lawyer