RAMZAN versus STATE
Article 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Review of Evidence The accused had no motive for committing cold blood \ The victim's name was not listed in the FIR, but was later referred to in the FIR Was also included for the accused. After the preparation of the inquiry report, it may be several days since his arrest took effect 22/23 days when eyewitnesses were not mentioned in the FIR and inquiry report, suspicious of his presence at the scene. Was. The one who was interested did not encourage trust and was tricked by medical evidence. The accused, along with the complainant, was found guilty of serious reflection on the victim's father's routine and the credibility of the investigation case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Hyderabad lawyer
