The definitions of Sections 302/149 and 148 of the evidence were not matched by the guns of the accused persons and their recovery did not result in the recovery of the gun, so an eyewitness was the only witness and his Relying on unsubstantiated testimony was extremely unsafe. The second eyewitness was the real brother of the deceased witness, and the confession was an interesting witness that was not relied on as far as the participation of the four missing accused was concerned and their claim was made. The suspects were acquitted on suspicion of firearm condition by the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
