Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR ALI versus ABDUL HAFEEZ

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 (3) (ii) and 15 of the Downtown Landlord's Personal Requirement for the Personal Use of the Landlord Personally, the tenant in the shop displaces the tenant Must do, prove. In this premises, good faith was required for his own use or the use of any of his children. That he or her children are not occupying any building or rented land in the same urban area as their needs. And that he had not vacated such a building or rented land for any reason since the commencement of Ordinance VI of 1959, the only evidence in this house was his own statement regarding the personal need of the landlord, Insufficient to prove a personal use case of the premises by the owner. Thus, the landlord failed to prove such evidence on record, however, it was clearly pointed out that Malala was the rental controller and not the appellate authority to dismiss the landlord's tenant. Only the tenant had failed to appreciate the evidence on record in the dismissal order. The provisions of section 13 (3) of the Ordinance were not properly formed, therefore, their decisions were bound to set aside the orders of the tenant and the appellant, authority was set aside and The request to exclude the circumstances was dismissed. top advocates from Bhalwal lawyer