Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR


Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The case for the objection of the defendants before the trial of the constitutional petition in which no decree was passed till the target date of 31 198 1986, in terms of section 15, Punjab No order can be approved. In the Syed Kamal Shah case (PLD 1986 SC 360), the pre-emption Act, 1913, based on the rule laid down by the Supreme Court, was all the contribution to the dispute raised by the defendant but not to the Constitutional High Court. , While using the unusual jurisdiction under Article. 199 of the Constitution was to decide whether the orders contained in it were passed without any jurisdiction. The question is whether a case can be decided in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court (PLD 1986 SC 360). Only the court can decide the jurisdiction of the preliminary jurisdiction of the trial and the appellate court dismissed the case and the case was dismissed due to the lack of court fees.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.