SAJIDA KISHWAR versus AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT AND WAGES ACT
Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Section 1 (4) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitutional Requirements Employed by the school, Railways are paid by such employee. During the period of absenteeism from the employee claiming to be employed under Section 1 (4) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the authority was transferred under the Salary Payment Act, 1923, Had no effect. The Labor Court did not comply with the Railway Traffic Movement in any way as a working school teacher, on the grounds that the employee was not paid as a school teacher's wages Act, 1923. Was neither affiliated with the track nor employed in any case. The definition of labor provided in section 1 (4) for the operation or maintenance of vehicles etc. and the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, was not drawn, therefore, the railway school employee could not be considered a workman. n In fact, the employee for labor law was a public servant in the sense of section 2 (b), the Civil Servants Act, 1973 Federal Service Tribunal, owned exclusive jurisdiction in relation to the terms and conditions of the public servant. Therefore, due to the bar contained in Article 212 (2) of the Constitution, the employees at the forum below were not able to dispel the request and these forums excluded it rightly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
