Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAEES versus IMAMUD DIN

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j) and 15 (2) (vii) The landlord and the tenant belong to the landlord's personal needs; he was not the owner of the land he owned, and thus It was not entitled to evict when needed, the tenant not only reached the tenancy agreement between the parties, but acknowledged that the landlord was the landlord, but also acknowledged the inspection. It was reported that he was filing rent in court in the name of the landlord / landlord. He also acknowledged that the landlord had served him through the notice and claimed that he was the landlord himself and added that the brother of the landlord. The landlord, by the tenant, admitted before the court that he was not the owner of the premises, but the landlord demanding the eviction of the tenant was the premises owner in Quito. n The tenant's dispute that the landlord was not the owner of the property in the dispute, thus had no substance and ability and the tenant was declared to be resident under the law so that he could deny the title of the landlord. ? According to the evidence on record, the landlord was also the owner and landlord of the land, according to the evidence on the record, under section 15 (2) (vii) of the Sindh tenant premises, on the basis of personal necessity. Could have applied for. Ordinance, 1979 Law in the Martyrs (1984), Article 115 online advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer