Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD DERVAISH AL-GILANI versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF


The appeal of the original decree of the CPC Act Rule XLI, XML, R 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was not lacking in the remand evidence of the principles of the case, instead of remanding the appellate court itself. The power of the remand should have been decided. The matter should not be used lightly but caution should be exercised in obtaining remand. The court should examine the evidence and if the examination concludes that it is not sufficient to make a decision or decide the matter between the parties, the case should be remanded or the court may hear it itself. Record the evidence and decide it. However, where there was sufficient evidence on the record that could be decided, the remand would not be appropriate. The application for leave of appeal was changed to appeal, the case was remanded to the High Court to hear the appeal. After giving notice to the parties and decide on the qualifications

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Kot Addu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.