Find a Lawyer

BAKHT RAWAN versus SANDOZ (PAKISTAN) LIMITED, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Article 25A & 51 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O12 High Court directs the filing of a retirement from the service employer filing an appeal in the Supreme Court against HS. The amount of back pay payable to the employees and the employer in the High Court was accordingly decided by the Supreme Court against the employer, but the order related to the payment of the money submitted to the High Court was later decided by the Supreme Court. Was not approved when the employee was retired at the age of a fine. Although the employer did not object to the payment of the return benefits it had submitted to the High Court in compliance with the Supreme Court order, it said that the employees should move the Supreme Court to release the amount. , This is a legitimate job, it can be a burden. It was for the employer and the employer to return the money under the order of the Supreme Court employee. After the extension of the job, after retiring from the job, the employees were required to pay the employees on such retirement. There was no obligation to pay the month's notice. when you need a advocate from Gambet lawyer