SH. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND 5 OTHERS
Section 202020/6871/7171 Military Courts Trial and Jurisdiction of Supreme Court and High Court [CMLO] 77] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition against Summary Military Court Response to the action taken by the summary military court on the FIR filed against him and his sentence and his orders to deliver possession of the property to the respondent were positively struck because Action was initiated on the direction of the Chief Martial Law Administrator. At the request of the defendant, who was the Deputy Counsel in the Cabinet Division and failed to transfer the property as well as the judicial proceedings, so was the application of the petition in the Supreme Court after the proceedings before the summary military court, whereby the powers were invalid. The use was revealed. The Martial Law Authorities and Summary Military Court applied for a personal purpose so that the respondent could seize the property, which was started with the intention of encouraging the desire to acquire the property through illegal means which would not be allowed. It may have been that the record of summary military court proceedings was not presented to the High Court, it may be reasonably inferred that the applicant's conviction was not based on any evidence even if the payment of the value of the property. If the alleged fraud in the series was committed, the prior order and transfer of his allotment Q: I did not join any alliance. The Applicant, which was retained by the Supreme Court long before its assessment, the Summary Military Court applied for the charges against it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
