GHULAM QADIR versus MANSHA AND 12 OTHERS
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/109/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 173 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Magistrate Magistrate's Disposal Issue of the accused, whose two close relations were extended days. Were killed in the light of He was transferred to an independent agency to transfer the way he was being investigated by the local police and as a result the authority of the meeting was assigned to the D section P headquarters, but the same day the D-section The P had hardly taken any steps, the file was withdrawn from them on 15 12 1994 and another section P on the same day, agreeing to an investigation by a local police, recorded a landlord, ie a section. I and section HO section HO then moved the same day to remove the accused magistrate without applying to the meteorite magistrate. Although he had sent the aforementioned indictment a day earlier, it was used for judicial lockup and, mechanically and without appreciating the evidence submitted so far, without giving any valid reason for his support. The cases were heard on May 28, 1994, and the manner in which the investigation was conducted was withdrawn from the D section P headquarters, which was assigned by the competent authority, in such circumstances by the Alka Magistrate. The complainant who passed the 1994 order had certainly looted the trust of the order. Passed without any legal authority and no legal effect and the magistrate was sent to trial for the proper order keeping the above facts and accordingly the constitutional application was accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Narang Mandi lawyer