Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Criminal Code of Conduct (V1898), 540 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Complainant before the trial court against the CRPC 540, CCP Was applied under. Submit some documents when the prosecution closed its evidence and the statement of the accused under 344 was to be recorded to the CCP, the trial court dismissed the plea with the observation that the matter has been on fire for the past 16 years. Applying and not at any stage. The complainant deemed it necessary to apply for additional evidence and also said that the documents presented by him could not be helpful unless some evidence came to prove the author's identity. This will mean that the trial will resume. The court refused to interfere with the review jurisdiction when satisfied with the trial court's reasoning, the trial case, which was perfectly justified in dismissing the complainant's request for additional evidence. The court rightly refused to interfere with the ruling that involuntary orders could not identify the factual, legal or jurisdiction of any weakness which, in fact, was denied on the basis of an unexpected leave of appeal. Was [proof] famous high court advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer