MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ versus THE STATE
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Review of Evidence The charge of adultery by medical evidence, although not fully maintained, was true whether or not the ejaculation took place. Hyman did not explode Victim's testimony did not face any contradiction or departure from the original prosecutor's case and was confirmed by medical evidence, neither the complainant nor the police in this case were liars. There was no enmity against the accused when he was involved. The conviction and imprisonment of the accused by the trial court was maintained in the circumstances, however, the charge of abolishing the sentence was retained by the death sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Digri lawyer
