The evidence for the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) was not credible, nor was it corroborated by the contents of the FIR or by the Investigation Officer serologist's report. Despite the fact that there was evidence that the Chemical Examiner had sent a mini scrub to attach the accused's shalwar to the police investigating officer, all the action was not done in the police station but on the road as he claimed. The trial court failed to perform its duty as per law in respect of Tazqiya al-Shudh, even though more than four witnesses claimed to have seen the commission of the crime from their eyes, the trial court also testified under section 161. Depending on the statement of the CCP, he was acquitted in the circumstances, even though he had demonstrated corruption and was declared an anti-terrorist.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
