MUHAMMAD NASIM AKHTAR versus ZOHRA BEGUM
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 Applicant's complaint was that the trial court was not aware of the High Court's decision rejecting the case for occupying the house and the court had exhibited it on record in support of its claim. The defendants, in their written statement, and the trial court's finding of contempt of court affirmed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the dismissal of his case, and may not be so In the matter, any inquiry should be made by the Supreme Court. Should any party's case in the appeal be prejudiced, the petition was dealt with the observation that the appellate court should consider all the documents, including the Supreme Court and the High Court decisions, when deciding the applicant's appeal. ? Record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sehwan lawyer
