Find a Lawyer

ALI MURAD versus AYUB KHAN

Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The appeal against the grounds that the High Court had to dismiss the death was not sufficiently speculative, but the opinion of the doctor about the possibility of prosecution in isolation. Had to read the evidence. The injured were wrongly approached by the High Court in rejecting the direct evidence of a police officer who was found unconscious, who recorded the statement of the injured, and there was ocular evidence of the eyewitness testimony with the injured. Was The version given by the injured witnesses of the witnesses involved in the FIR, who were natural witnesses of the incident, with no prior hostility or motive for the accused's false interference, were excluded only because they were related to the deceased. Can be done In the dates of the injury report and the Investigation Representative, the matter was fully explained by the High Court by the investigating officer in the case and the motive in the case did not make any sense. The identity of the accused was substantially proved. The missing gunman recovered from the scene was reportedly fired from the recovered gun. The deceased's statement was strongly endorsed and the prosecution thus proved its case beyond any reasonable doubt as the trial court was headed by the High Court while the prosecution in its original context after criminal justice was registered. The evidence was not disregarded. Admittedly set aside by the High Court and the accused was convicted under Section 302, PPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. list of advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer