Find a Lawyer

AASIA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Upon becoming aware of the provisions of Articles 204, Article 204, High Court of the contempt of court Act 1976 (Article 204), the Superintendent of Prisons did not allow the applicant's lawyer to interview the detainees at the jail premises. The state adviser informed the jail superintendent via messenger that despite receiving such notice and acknowledging the presence of a detained counselor in the jail premises, the prison superintendent had not been allowed to meet the incarcerated excuse. , Counsel for counsel will ask for interview with Amra prison superintendent. The gate could not be arranged due to the high rate of detention at the gate and the lawyer's lawyer accepted such an explanation, after which the jail superintendent was charged with disorderly conduct, Therefore, it was proved in these circumstances that the pardon offered by the jail superintendent was not unconditional, whereas in such cases the plaintiff should confess his guilt and then place it at the mercy of the court itself. He did not apologize, though in case of disqualification, no amendment would be made for the offense of blasphemy, however, It can be addictive and asked forgiveness for the purpose of sentencing by the prison superintendent. If convicted of contempt of court, he was sentenced to simple imprisonment for five days and a fine of five thousand rupees, and in case of non-payment of fine for another three days, the plaintiff will suffer. famous supreme court advocate from Buchay Key lawyer