PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION, KARACHI versus MUJEEBUR REHMAN
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Ss 2 (xxviii) and the dismissal of 25 employees who were initially hired as highly skilled workers, were promoted as foremen, but their services were simply canceled. Was made, without giving any notice and the reason. The dismissal led to the termination that the employee was not promoted due to employment. The employee was actually working as a forklift operator and no supervisor was performing the duties because manager or deputy manager employee VAS had not released any job description and had never approved the leave or any Any order was passed on the worker because under the circumstances, the subordinate Labor Court concluded that the employee was entitled to be employed in the meaning of section 2 (xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and the reason for the employment of the service. The dismissal order was also rightly rejected. Such an abolition was terminated without any reasons
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Larkana lawyer