GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN
The Respondents' Choice of Respondents was removed from the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 27, 199 and 185 as UN monitors in foreign countries and The person who was younger and who was not. Even before the selection board was elected, the respondent was once posted to the United Nations mission and worked there. The government refused to send the constitutional respondent overseas so that the new officers Also be given the opportunity, within its constitutional scope, to instruct the government to include the defendant's name in a mission that could be sent to any foreign country in the future, however, in the intra-court appeal to the federal government. It was directed to send the respondent overseas, as well as being a civil servant, to assure the rights of his services. Job was subject to regular government employees. The Act, 1974, and its rules from time to time, are hereby enacted. It was raided when the defendant refused to be sent abroad saying it would hurt the government to earn foreign exchange, but government employees would have no right to retain the constitutional petition and would be difficult to provide relief. The appropriate cover will be presented by the High Court. Intra-Court Appeal The loss recognized in earning foreign exchange is hardly a violation of any law. The constitutional jurisdiction was inherently arbitrary, even if the case of a public servant was a good case, which could have been ruled out if it was to be far more damaging.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer