FARRUKH SALIM versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Limitation) Order 1979 Sections 324, 353 and 186 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Haddad) Order (4 of 1979), Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Appeal FIR The argument that the petitioner was a disabled man who could not move and that the allegations contained in the FIR were false, was a factual dispute which could not be determined till the inquiry was conducted by the High Court which May also include recordings of various individuals' statements to search. Regarding the fact that the facts stated in the FIR were false or that the facts were found to be baseless in the constitutional application, such exercise is generally exercised by the High Court under its constitutional jurisdiction to determine disputed facts. I could not be brought.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kazi Ahmed lawyer
