Find a Lawyer

QAMAR LOAN versus KASHMIRIAN (PVT.) LTD

Ordinance of Companies 1984 Sections 305 and 290 The end of the company and the appointment of a public liquidator relationship between the parties, in partnership with the limited company form a partnership firm in which two directors of each of the parties holding 50% share refer to the company. What was Two brothers were included as a family concern and the attitudes and behaviors of the parties together show that the company lacks trust and confidence and that the company's business has been suspended for more than two and a half years. While using the jurisdiction under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, the parties have long been trying to distribute assets and assets in the name of the company, keeping in mind the events and developments that followed. Was competent but there was no mutual settlement that the court could use at its discretion. In the wake of the changed CI, there have been many cases of mold relief to avoid litigation and full justice between the parties, and there is a complete dead lock in the running of the company's affairs among others and that the company Were not matters of The Companies Ordinance, 1984, is neither compliant nor is it likely to act. The only and proper relief would be that the company would be ordered to liquidate. Government property was appointed as an official levyholder with all the options of capturing assets, liabilities, debts. And Company securities law firms from Wahi hassain lawyer