Find a Lawyer

CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI versus GHULAM HABIB RANA

Challenged in section 14 (1) of the Cantonment Act 1924, constitutional application issued under the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Notification, Section 14 (1), the Cantonment Act, 1924 The notification issued by the federal government under Section 14 Cantonment Board, 22 2 1995, declared that the constitution of the Cantonment Board must be changed for one year, it was unlawful by a single bench of the High Court. And was declared illegal. The constitutional jurisdiction did not have any file before the federal government for the issuance of a notification that was in the original file, indicating that a letter from a member of the Cantonment Board for the disqualification of another member on the basis of his political affiliation On the basis of this, the federal government formed the opinion that the environment of the Cantonment Board had become highly politicized, which caused obstacles to the administration. Apart from the Cantonment Board, the President, the Cantonment Board, considered the situation extremely political. Recommended to the federal government for changes in the composition of the cantonment board, which The issue was discussed that the notification can not be stopped by people for their political affiliation Cantonment Board members. In this way the political affiliation of any member of the Cantonment Board will not disqualify him from membership. The action taken by the government would be to give the constituency of the elected members the right to vote, as there is a lack of suitable material. Such condolences cannot be allowed in the presence. After the record was put on hold, it was unreasonable to issue a notification and the federal government law firms from Mehar lawyer