Find a Lawyer

COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, MULTAN versus MUHAMMAD YAR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O12 (3) \ Workmanship Employee Status \ Workman \ Person Not to fall under section 2 (xxviii), the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, when the worker must be treated as "of where employees' services are terminated, in violation of section (3) of section O12, and , As described in Section 2 (i). , The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, claiming to be a 'labor', though not under the purview of the worker or worker involved under section 2 (xxviii), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. will come. , He will clearly attract the priority of labor laws, except where the employee was performing manual or academic work and was not engaged in any administrative or executive or supervisory duties, including "labor. "Will be considered and will be entitled to request jurisdiction. The Labor Company's URT, moreover, when many of its livelihoods were stripped due to its termination of service, being an employee / laborer, legally required to resolve their complaint. Can approach the Labor Court at immigration advocates email from Manoabad lawyer