MUHAMMAD HAMAYUN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Sections 42 and 161 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 and Pakistan (1973), Article 199, banned appeals against the ratification of the Constitution. The High Court should use them only in exceptional circumstances. The High Court generally will not review the facts reached before the Courts / Tribunals even if it is the wrong court which has the subject Jurisdiction, whether right or wrong, in the exercise of the same constitution according to its jurisdiction This can be decided. The jurisdiction only acts in its oversight capacity and not the appellate court high court, thus only intervening in cases where the inferior court / tribunal acted without jurisdiction or failed to exercise its jurisdiction. Lived or took more action than the jurisdiction where the applicants had. After almost 33 months of silence, and then, the Appeal filed an instant confirmation of the change before the Additional Commissioner, who accepted the fact without notice of the time restriction, the Board of Revenue made the Additional Commissioner's Board. It was absolutely justified in deciding the orders of the Revenue, neither with any jurisdiction nor in excess of it was decided in the matter according to the principles of jurisdiction and natural justice. No interference in the constitutional jurisdiction was confirmed, so the citation by the Revenue Officer was repeated Was declared.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Ziarat lawyer