Find a Lawyer

KACHKOL versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 201/34 Review of evidence did not prove to be a motive for the crime The recovery of the body from inside the deceased's bosom did not link the accused to the commission of the crime in which he was involved. The matter was spread by rumors and suspicions about their suspicious relationship in the area, which did not prove to be lawful, but the recovery of the crime weapon from the suspect's home was not only highly suspicious, In fact, the use of a weapon of crime was extremely suspicious. Rah Belch's recovery and use of it in the commission of the crime were not credible, alleging that the statements of the accused were suspicious and highly suspicious, because of the prosecution's suspicion that the suspects in the case were proved. The step-by-step testimony was proven to have led to harassment, evidence discovery and training. The confession cannot be relied upon to maintain the prosecution's story on suspicion of crime and many illnesses, as it could not replace the evidence of the crime, and the defendants were acquitted under the circumstances. ask a advocate free from Panjgur lawyer